« May 2003 | Main | July 2003 »

June 2003 Archives

June 2, 2003

Love Letters In The Sand

I am torn by guilt.

I just edited the previous post two days later because I was uncomfortable with some of it.

Not the content -- just a few phrases that seemed awkward.

For some reason I'm troubled by this.

Which is laughable. I'm the world's worst nitpicker and rewriter. I mentioned earlier that I'd put one piece through 57 drafts (a good portion of those on a typewriter) and I'm still not sure if it's ready to go out into the big bad world.

Still, revising one's work in full view of the public leaves me feeling queasy.

I drunkenly wrote a piece on the Great White concert fire in Rhode Island back in February and yanked it off the next morning, disgusted with my glib and shallow words.

I put it up again when I'd written a coda that covered my ass to some degree. (Not that it mattered -- no one's hit the original, nor the emendation.)

I'm not sure if I'm trying to protect the public's sensibilities or mine.

To quote (sort of, I think) Vladimir Nabokov:

Showing the first drafts of your work is like showing the contents of your handkerchief.

June 3, 2003

Memories

When I was a teenage punk our family would vacation in Jasper, Alberta, about 200 miles west from here.

Beautiful place, nestled up in the Rockies. Beautiful golf course, too, at the Jasper Park Lodge. It was there that I had my first (OK, first legitimate. OK, first semi-legitimate) beer, and icy and delicious it was, because I'd finally graduated from my Dad's caddy to his golfing partner.

My Dad was no slouch on the links: He was the Alberta Open Junior champ for a couple of years. So it was a bit of a thrill to tee up alongside him, even though I skulled my first shot about 50 yards into the trees where for all I know, it's still being sniffed by bears.

But prior to that the course marshal approached us and asked if we'd like to make up a foursome. One of our new partners was a Mountie who always got his man but who was terrible at the short-iron game.

Meanwhile, back at the cabin, I awoke one day to a godawful thumping and rustling and rushed out to confront an elk cow who was grazing the bushes.

This, I thought, is a Kodak moment. I got my camera and got up nice and close and snapped a lot of photos of this doe-eyed, inquisitively-snouted beast.

These pictures provided much hilarity among me and my sisters and parents until the aforementioned RCMP officer dropped by for a barbeque. He chuckled politely about them and the first chance he got he jerked me aside and got in my face and said quietly,

"Listen. She might look cute, but she's a wild animal. If she gets spooked or if she thinks you're between her and her babies she'll stomp you flat and then I'm gonna have to come out here and scrape you off the ground. I don't want to have to do that."

This, I should add, was accompanied by a not-so-gentle finger poking assault on my sternum that accelerated in tempo as he developed his argument.

Point taken. Since that day I have never molested an elk, moose, or other furry denizen of the forest.

Damn, I wish I could remember that man's name.

Damn, I wish I could go golfing with my Dad again.

Damn, damn, double goddamn.

June 4, 2003

Hate To Say I Told You So

Woke up this morning to my clock radio blaring out some insipid rock tune that sounds like every other insipid rock tune made in what seems the last ten years. It's like they were all carved off the same slab of donair meat or something.

I'm sure someone out there is making good music, but you'd never know it from the two main rock stations in town.

It's no wonder that filesharing has taken off like it has. If that's the best you can offer, guys, then vivent la révolution!


Maybe the best song I've come across in the last year was The Hives' Hate To Say I Told You So. It's kick-ass rock and roll with energy and sass like I haven't heard since The Clash and Sex Pistols. A swirling guitar attack, snotty lyrics,

Do what I please
Gonna spread the disease
Because I wanna
Gonna call all the shots
All the no's and the not's
Because I wanna

and a great dynamic range (just a fancy way of saying that they quickly go from very quiet to very LOUD).

And where did I hear it first? Not on radio. I still haven't heard it on radio.

On TV, hockey games to be specific, when they fill in between faceoffs. It's a sad commentary when your average arena music director is hipper than the sausage pushers on FM radio.

Oh, yeah, there's a campus radio station in town which occasionally plays some interesting stuff. But they're just as likely to broadcast a 3-hour Peruvian nose-flautist hootenanny.

Multiculturalism is fine, but I draw the line somewhere just past Swedish punk bands.

I give you the UN, which is as about as multicultural as it gets, and you don't want to listen to that Musak, either.

June 5, 2003

Question

Hmmm. My apologies to anyone viewing this with a Netscape browser. I just noticed the problem a couple of days ago and had to do a bit of research to find out what was going on.

In fact, I usually use Netscape myself, but I post to this site with IE, because the WYSIWYG interface requires it. Because I'm a dunce with HTML. (Though I can throw acronyms around with abandon.)

A Netscape browser will show the pages with question marks dispersed randomly throughout.

This is because Crimsonblog was written on some MS software that apparently interprets some characters incorrectly. I didn't suspect this because my earlier blog on Crimsonzine worked fine with either browser.

A slightly more technical explanation:

It's people writing web pages with Windows software that uses the wrong character for apostrophes. Instead of the ' character, it uses a Windows specific character set that pretends to be iso-8859-X compatible but has characters in the "non printable control code" part of the ISO character sets. That's why you see them as question marks.

It's all a part of Gates' evil plan to destroy Netscape.

Although Netscape is doing a fine enough job of doing that all by itself. Its bookmarking function alone is enough to make you tear your hair out. And in any case, Netscape is pinin' for the fjords, according to Paul Kedrosky of the National Post.

AOL Time-Warner and Microsoft settled their lawsuit last week. The agreement amounts to a death sentence for Netscape, the former Internet browser kingpin. While that wasn't the avowed purpose of the deal, the result will be no different than if it was.


[. . .]

Some, however, are arguing that a $750-million payment from Microsoft to AOL Time-Warner in the deal is a win for Netscape. It isn't. Consider what AOL Time-Warner paid for Netscape back in 1999. The deal, originally announced at $4.2-billion, ballooned to almost $8-billion in stock by the time it was completed.

If this payment constitutes defeat, Microsoft would happily be defeated more often in future. After all, fear of Microsoft made AOL pay billions for a defunct Netscape, partly in hopes it could resuscitate the doomed company, but more to use the company as a legal stalking horse. But for its $8-billion investment, AOL received $750-million. That is a lousy rate of return in any economy.

June 6, 2003

Take Me Out To The Ball Game

I'm timeshifting again.

By which I mean I've confounded the natural order of things and TV programmers and illegally taped a baseball game to have some little piece of sound and light humming away in the corner while I tap at this computer and contemplate the squalid ruin that is my life.

But I digress.

Toronto vs Cincinatti, I think. I'm not paying it a lot of attention.

Like Proust with his madeleine, though, memories come drifting back, and I must lie abed for the next twenty years composing my rememberances . . .

A baseball costs -- what? -- 10 bucks? I assume, subtracting inflation, that it was about the same value back when baseball began on the cusp of the 20th century.

The difference was that the teams were basically amateur then, playing for pennies, accomodations, and huzzah!s

The baseball was the one indispensable piece of equipment that they had, and they typically only had one of them, so when a ball was hit into the bleachers, the spectators would toss it out again so that the game could continue.

Until the day when some guy caught it and refused to give it back. Outrage! He was dragged before the local magistrate, still clutching the ball. Who considered the matter, and pronounced: Finders, keepers. Losers, weepers.

Maybe he worded it better.

(By the way, I've got no idea where or when I heard this story. I'll bet Proust was making half of his stuff up, too.)

Major League Baseball took note of judicial precedent, and thereafter allowed fans to keep fouled or homered balls.

Not so with grounders or misaimed throws that stayed on the field. The ball boy would scamper out and scamper back to his perch down the infield line, hoarding the magic orb like it was the Hope Diamond, ignoring the pleading hands of children.

Come the strike of (95?) that cancelled the World Series and thoroughly soured fans on the sport.

There was a lot of cluckclucking about what baseball had to do to win back its audience.

Fast forward a year later. Joe Carter of the Blue Jays catches a routine popup in right field to end the inning and starts to trot off to the dugout. He abruptly veers off to the stands and with that big-ass, dazzling smile of his, hands the ball to a little boy who was literally hopping with delight.

The TV announcer: "Whoa! Now there's a fan for life!"

Exactly.

Watch the ball boys these days. Any stray shot is scooped up and delivered to the nearest kiddikin as the cameras zoom in.

It's great PR, and it's cheap. 10 bucks per baseball * 20 balls per game = future goodwill ^3.

I can't help but wonder if some bigwig in MLB saw the same game and sent out a memo.

If baseball can be rescued, then maybe Joe Carter should get some of the credit.

June 8, 2003

Goin' To The Country

I was going through some papers a while ago and came across this, which I'd entirely forgotten.

I used to listen to Gzowski's popular national CBC radio program.

One feature of it was letters from listeners. Which would too very often be floridly poetic paeans to the Canadian wilderness, stark landscapes, yaddayaddayadda, that went on and on and on until even Pierre Berton's withered peepee would collapse with the metaphoric strain of it all.

So I wrote this. Gzowski liked it enough to read it on-air (I unfortunately didn't hear it) and some months later I got a phone call from one of my cousins down east.

"Did you write a letter to Peter Gzowski?"

"Uh . . . yeah? Yeah!"

"He's put it in the Morningside Papers! (A series of books featuring interviews, essays, etc. from the show.)

And so he had. My fifteen seconds of fame.

January 8, 1989

Mr. Peter Gzowski
Morningside
CBC Radio
Box 500, Terminal A
Toronto, Ontario

Dear Peter,

It is quiet, now, out here. Winter has arrived, and all the powerboats and summer guests have fled. Night, and a fat full moon rides balefully above. It has been a tiring, yet rewarding day. There was wood to chop; wood to stack; and finally, wood to restack, after it all fell over. I stir the stove's slumbering embers, and then I yawn, and stumble away to bed. But sleep eludes me, for I am troubled by our reluctance to learn to live with, to co-exist, with nature.

As in counterpoint to my thoughts, there filters from without a mournful cry, a lament. The voice echoes again, again: haunting, piercing. Roused, I toss aside the blankets and struggle into my clothes.

The crisp inky air is like a tonic; an icy crust crunches under my boots. Where is the sly caroller? Ah, there he is, roosting in that leaf-stripped poplar! His imperious golden eye studies me coolly; no words do we exchange, but still we seem to understand each other. Man and owl; owl and man. Again his lusty screech -- and suddenly the forest explodes into a fine snowy glitter as I attempt to knock the stupid branch-hopping pest into orbit with the 5-iron I keep for this purpose, long ago having realized I was just no damn good at golf.

Sincerely,

notalex
Edmonton (or thereabouts), Alberta


June 9, 2003

Ch-ch-ch-changes

Wow. I . . .

I'm sorry, I'm just, uh . . .

Whoa there! A little bit emotional on my part.

As you can see, we've just unrolled our long-awaited blog redesign, and we're bustin' our buttons about it. I thought you might like to hear from some of the team that made this possible.

We'll be chatting with:

knotalex, our director of marketing and programming "guru";

pnotalex, our art director and webmaster;

and gnotalex, our "creative" guy and all-round bon vivant.

These are busy guys, and it took some doing, but I eventually got them all in the same place at the same time and switched on the tape recorder:

notalex: Let's start with a general question. What was the impetus for this change? Let's go around the table.

knotalex: The blog had become . . . stale.

pnotalex: Predictable. Time to shake things up.

notalex: Was there a pivotal . . . no, . . . a tipping point?

gnotalex: When you stuck your head in the office and yelled, "MAKE IT SO!"

[laughter]

notalex: What changes can the average reader expect to see?

pnotalex: It's quite dramatic. Whereas the previous blog was very, uh . . .

gnotalex: Brown. It was brown.

knotalex: More of a reddish-brown. Something like Red Ochre.

gnotalex: Then you've got the brightness on your monitor turned up too high.

pnotalex: I thought it was green!

[laughter]

notalex: And now?

knotalex: Definitely, uh, bluer.

gnotalex: Don't forget the grey. There's dark grey, and light grey.

knotalex: How do you remember how to spell "grey"? I'm always getting it mixed up with the American spelling, you know, "g-r-a-y."

gnotalex: The best way that I've found is to think of the Grey Cup. I mean, the "Gray" Cup just doesn't look right, does it?

pnotalex: I thought it was green!

[laughter]

notalex: How difficult were the technological challenges?

knotalex: Whew! [laughter] At some points we were working with raw HTML code.

pnotalex: There were a lot of heated arguments, and on one occasion --

knotalex: an actual fistfight. [laughter]

pnotalex: More of a shoving match. But it was intense.

notalex: For the benefit of the people too stupid to figure out how to read this on their computers, HTML is . . .?

knotalex: It's like a different language or something. I just know that it's unforgiving. You miss an angle bracket here or there and all of a sudden the page looks like shit.

gnotalex: I've just gotta say something here. I don't know anything about this computer mumbo-jumbo. I just know that what they do makes it possible for me to do my work. [singing] All the little people, where do they all belong?

knotalex: Listen, you pompous a--

notalex: Speaking of the little people, where do you see your audience, and how do you hope to expand it?

knotalex: I guess I should take this one. We've done extensive research that indicates we've got a crucial foothold in the 34-50 male demographic. We've further isolated it down to Arthur Rutkowski (Artyman the Partyman!) of Vegreville, Alberta, a 35-year-old unemployed man who lives in his parents' basement and consumes reckless amounts of beer and Quaaludes.

gnotalex: Which is a critical detail. Beer and 'ludes, he's got a maximum of --

pnotalex: Five minutes, tops, of viable blogreading. That's a very narrow window we're shooting for.

notalex: Has there been any discussion on how to break out to other depressive pharmaceuticals?

gnotalex: Xanax.

knotalex: We did look at Xanax. We still see possibilities there.

pnotalex: There was a lot of discussion about Valium.

knotalex: But that's a girly drug. Valium and white wine. [laughter]

pnotalex: And we realized that gnotalex would have to get more in touch with his "sensitive" side to hold any female readers.

knotalex: Now that's a creepy prospect.

gnotalex: Heh.

notalex: Any thoughts about hallucinogenics? Peyote, mushrooms, LSD?

pnotalex: Nah, we figure that Warren Kinsella's got that crowd locked up.

notalex: So where from here?

knotalex: Onward and upward, man. The die is cast. This is the new paradigm.

pnotalex: Unless someone complains. Then we'd change it all back.

gnotalex: He's only got five minutes. What are the odds?

June 12, 2003

Deer Prudence

A funny column from Andy Lamey of the National Post yesterday on "trophy poetry."

Which is:

Trophy poetry is defined by two characteristics: It tends to be written by people who have achieved fame in fields far removed from poetry; and it is very bad.

Read the whole thing here -- one of the more hilarious examples he provides was by John Kerry, the Democratic senator running for the presidential nomination:

I had a talk with a deer today / we had a talk on the road some way ... between his frequent snorts / he asked me if I sought his pelt / cause if I did he said he felt / quite out of sorts.

Yikes. Not exactly Emily Dickinson, is it?

June 13, 2003

Uselessies

. . . a lazy nogoodnik no luck no truck no nothing Nanook & then one day Penelope I sat down & asked myself awright U terrible piece of trash how can U too nab nugget buckets chockablock fulla easy chopchop utilizing idiotproof DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE METHOD SYSTEM & meltaway unwanted pounds with UGLYFAT ZAPAWAY MACHINE & study the forbidden secrets of ANCIENT MOORISH VEGOCHOPPER, O just trust your nose & scent of rainbows as detailed in my subliminal cassette autobiography GOON? LOON? TYCOON! & so I marched right in there & that bank manager actually spit at me spit at me was that a nice thing to do I ask you that was not a nice thing to do if you ask me & very unprofessional on his part but behold this was all revealed in chapter seven of HOP SKIP JUMP TO ZILLIONAIRE VOODOO GODHOOD & so I returned to onceagain outline my proposals & realized immediate cashflow of $249 $745 $503 by compounding leverage & maximizing downturn & waving Smith & Wesson .38 around & spit at him spit at him & though stupid velvetrope maze somewhat complicated getaway have now refinanced debt to society & I believe I believe I know that the HARDLARD MUSCLEPAC TORTURACK folds up & stands in corner thus providing benefits of complete aerobic workout as you bang the vacuum cleaner against it for the next twenty years O call me crazy call me nuts call me now oneeighthundred & you are getting sleepy sleepy very sleepy I am getting sleepy sleepy very sleepy but as Marion will now demonstrate just a swig of ATOMIC TUMMY TONIC & look look lookit my Porsche Boxster rockstar vroomvroom & the red red blooms of Algeciras all perfume & my heart going like mad gonna park on the damn flowers if I wanna heres a grandstandhand forya officer I owe ya I own ya O hee O hie O ho hahah heres Hester Stanhope & old Captain Groves to tell you more Hester this seems like absolute garbage yes indeed it does seem like absolute garbage but thanks to the genius of Lipton G. Leobold who foresaw forsooth the need for SCIENTIFIC PERSONALITY UPGRADE you too can take off all your clothes & roll around in other people's money tired tired you are so sooo tired tired tired I am so sooo tired wait theres more its a three point plan 123 applause clapclap see it sparkle see it shine see if I can doze off now & if that jackboot jackass bossman thinks he can boss this boy around bossbossboss then quit I will quit spitspit O snap to it man streets paved with jewels strewn by fools why with gogetitiveness & vim & vigor & you will purchase MAGIMATIC MEMORY MODULE I will purchase MAGIMATIC MEMORY MODULE you will remember nothing nothing I remember nothing nothing all hail Colossus the king the world at your feet stomp stomp spitspitspit you are drifting drifting & speaking of which how would you like to ace that pesky entrance exam or would you rather squander your daze battling grimelords for control of the lucrative cigarette-butt trade yes you've tried to quit but you get those cravings hack ack ack just think of the savings & consider your brain a filing cabinet too much information bound to jam it & where is that Phillips file O I mean where is that Filipino screwdriver O I mean what was the name of that tastytasty bartenderstyle refreshment such as could be had in your finer type establishments where the doorman doesn't actually spit at you spit at you a simple three point plan 3 2 1 hurrah clap clap oneeighthundred succe$$ ce$$ e$$ $$ $ why do you dawdle slackjaw & staring when you could instead have your very own WONDERLIFE LOVECHARM INCANTATION yes & command your very own ROBOBUTLER to trill the plaintive peasant songs of unmapped Andalusia yes & thrill to the power of your very own MAGNETORAY WARTREMOVER franchise & then one day I stomped right in said quit quit I quit haha kachunk vroomvroom rompon onramp to fortune freeway to fun see my blinding white teeth chew up contracts crush through tile get outta my way & offa my pile nothing down nothing up nothing ever proved in court pending appeal free O free O free & draw the sword & jerk the cord & hit the ground running at zero zone alone foomp your parachute palace here at Alameda gardens just a hop skip jump to Duke street where the tip top guys oolala the bebop babes are standing by buy buhbye oneeighthundred now yes now uhhuh now 1 2 3 3 2 1 hut hut hut & yes I said yes I will Yes

ActionTrak ™ for 2003, assuming I can manage to get out of bed one of these days.

June 16, 2003

Hail To The Thief

Radiohead publisher blinks
Warner/Chappell backs down from demands that fan sites pull material

J. Kelly Nestruck
National Post

Monday, June 16, 2003


It was the latest battle over copyright infringement between the music industry and Internet-savvy fans, this time over lyrics and sheet music being distributed on Radiohead fan Web sites. In this case, however, the story had a happy ending.

"It's my magical story," said Mary Bichner, the Philadelphia-based Webmistress of Radiohead for the Pianoforte (RFTP).

Last Thursday, just over a week after threatening legal action against Bichner for posting her handwritten piano transcriptions of Radiohead songs on the Web, Warner/Chappell Music backtracked on its demands that she take down the scores. Warner/ Chappell, which owns the publishing rights to most of the British band's songs -- bowing to pressure from a torrent of vitriolic emails and telephone calls from angry fans -- has issued free "fan licences" to RFTP and several other fan sites, which gives them the right to distribute lyrics and arrangements over the Internet.

While several of these sites were informed about the special one-year fan licences earlier this month, Bichner was only contacted by Warner/Chappell last week. Her site is back online today, though now the scores have complete writer credits and copyright notices attached.

"The band gave it the OK, so they did a special licence for me," Bichner said. "I'm so excited [Radiohead] actually talked about me."

Even more exciting for Bichner, a 20-year-old student at Drexel University, she may end up working for Radiohead because of all this. In the letter informing her that she could put her site back up, Warner Bros. Publications representative Dave Olson wrote: "We are talking to the band about doing more piano arrangements of their music. If they agree to this, I will show samples of your scores to our staff arrangers and, if they like them and believe that they are commercially viable, I'm sure we can work something out with you to help us produce such a product."

"I'm so excited to, like, the 10th power," said the spunky redhead, who is a celebrity in her own right within the Radiohead Internet community.

On June 2, one week before the release of the band's latest album, Hail to the Thief, Warner/Chappell sent out an email to several fan sites asking them to take down the lyrics and guitar tabs sections. A new front in the war on Internet piracy had been opened.

Adriaan Pels, a Norwegian Web designer and hotel manager who runs a Radiohead fan site called At Ease, received one of these emails. "The availability of these files have a direct impact on our ability to market and sell our musical arrangements and songbooks, and that adversely affects the royalties that we are able to generate and pay to the band," it said.

Pels posted the letter on his Web site, protesting, "[They] want me to take down the full song archive, the backbone of this site, because they would like to sell those lyrics in songbooks."

The fans, 20,000 of which visit At Ease every day, were furious when they found out. Warner/ Chappell employees' email addresses and telephone numbers were posted on the site's message board, and the company was immediately deluged with emails and telephone calls. A Internet petition was created and within a few days had gathered nearly 10,000 names.

Pels received support not only from fans, but from the band itself. Stanley Donwood, who runs Radiohead's official Web site and created the artwork for the band's last four albums, sent Pels an email writing, "It's my personal opinion that fan sites do far more for both the band, the record and the publishing company than is generally recognized."

Warner/Chappell decided this was not a battle they wanted to fight, and created the fan licences so fan Web sites could legally post the band's lyrics.

Pels believes the music industry needs to acknowledge the role fan sites play in promoting bands and work with them, not against them. "I personally think that fan sites boost album sales, songbooks and live shows," he said via email. "A fan site like mine offers a detailed archive on the band with a news section that is updated several times per day and a message board where people can talk about the band. This keeps the fans interested, informed and connected with the band."

Representatives from Warner/ Chappell have not commented publicly on the issue or returned phone calls, but they appear to have decided it is better to have fans like Bichner and Pels on their side than deal with the fury of a fan base scorned.

Radiohead for the Pianoforte: www.littlerowboat.net; At Ease: www.ateaseweb.com

Well, yeah.

Some people are finally getting it. The whole notion of copyright is exploded and drifting down like spent fireworks.

The dummies are whining and threatening to call the police and the smarties are running around with baskets gathering up the pieces and trying to figure out how to reconstruct them in a workable sense.

My utter disdain for record companies predates Napster and Kazaa.

Prior to those networks (and the proliferation of broadband which made them feasible) about the only source of music on the Net was MIDI files.

These were tunes played with the synthesized sounds built into sound cards. Some people used keyboards, others laboriously picked out songs note-by-note with music-editing software.

The results varied enormously. I've heard almost perfect renditions of Dire Straits' "Sultans Of Swing" or U2's "Angels of Harlem." I've heard good-to-awful versions of the same, and I've heard songs that were so badly done that I had to recheck the title to figure out what it was.

All of a sudden, though, in about 1997 or '98, most of the popular MIDI sites abruptly shut down, in response to very threatening letters sent out by the legal departments of Sony, MCI, et al.

Keep in mind that nobody was making money off this; nor were the record companies or artists losing money from it. This was true amateurism -- people spending untold hours transcribing their favorite songs for nothing more than their love of the material and the praise of their peers.

Radiohead is to me an acquired taste -- I've only heard a couple of their songs, off the impenetrable Kid A album. I'm not inclined to rush out and buy their latest effort.

I'll bet, though, that the 20,000 fans who daily frequent their fan boards have bought legitimate copies of every thing they've done, every T-shirt and coffee mug they've released.

And I'll bet they'd go out and buy them all over again for the chance of an Internet chat with one of the band members, or an autographed CD.

Smart bands like Radiohead are picking up on this. Dumb bands like Metallica aren't.

June 17, 2003

Little G.T.O.

I bought an Xbox a few months ago, reluctantly.

I say reluctantly because I'm a bit of a snob about console games. Most of them seem to have sci-fi themes, which leave me cold, and the others are weighted heavily to sports titles and first-person shooters, at which, frankly, I suck. I prefer more meditative fare like Civilization, or chess or Railroad Tycoon (or the best wargame by far I've ever played, Combat Mission). You don't need a lot of computing and video horsepower to run them.

However, my PC is pushing the bottom end of the envelope per speed and memory when it comes to newer games. It's still fine, though, for most of what I use my computer for -- email, Internet, blogging, small programming projects, etc.

So which makes more sense? To spend $1000+ every couple of years to upgrade the computer or $300 for a new console with $700 left over to buy games?

Actually I wish Microsoft would come out with $700 worth of racing/rally titles. Barrelling through twisty vistas on a 30-inch TV in a darkened room with force feedback is quite immersive. Toss in a minor buzz and it's also as much fun as you can have with your pants on.

June 18, 2003

Orrin This All Together

From the Washington Post:

The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Tuesday he favors developing new technology to remotely destroy the computers of people who illegally download music from the Internet.

The surprise remarks by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, during a hearing on copyright abuses represent a dramatic escalation in the frustrating battle by industry executives and lawmakers in Washington against illegal music downloads.

During a discussion on methods to frustrate computer users who illegally exchange music and movie files over the Internet, Hatch asked technology executives about ways to damage computers involved in such file trading. Legal experts have said any such attack would violate federal anti-hacking laws.

"No one is interested in destroying anyone's computer," replied Randy Saaf of MediaDefender Inc., a secretive Los Angeles company that builds technology to disrupt music downloads. One technique deliberately downloads pirated material very slowly so other users can't.

"I'm interested," Hatch interrupted. He said damaging someone's computer "may be the only way you can teach somebody about copyrights."

The senator acknowledged Congress would have to enact an exemption for copyright owners from liability for damaging computers. He endorsed technology that would twice warn a computer user about illegal online behavior, "then destroy their computer."

Orrin, Orrin, Orrin.

You moron, moron, moron.

First off, there isn't any way that I'm aware of to "remotely destroy" someone's computer. You can wipe out data, sure, or corrupt the bootsector, or overwrite EPROMs, but all that can be repaired or restored, if at great bother and expense.

But let's imagine for a moment that you did have the technology to make this possible. Leaving aside entirely the flood of lawsuits that would ensue, you'll soon enough find out that a sword cuts in both directions.

Within seconds of unveiling your little doomsday device, you had best permanently disconnect yourself from the Internet, and the same applies to your terrorist buddies at the RIAA.

Or the hackers will do it for you. You'll be renting server space just to queue up the DNS attacks.

There are patriots who are shaping the terrain as we speak.

Orrin, Orrin, Orrin.

June 19, 2003

Friendly Fire At Kandahar

From the Edmonton Journal (CP) 19/06/03

Two American pilots who killed four Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan last year will not be court-martialled, an American military official said Thursday.

Maj. Harry Schmidt and Maj. William Umbach will instead be disciplined in an administrative forum, said Lt.-Gen. Bruce Carlson.

Carlson of the 8th Air Force in Barksdale, La., recommended that Schmidt go before a flight evaluation board to determine whether he can continue flying after dropping a 225-kilogram laser-guided bomb on the Canadian troops on April 18, 2002.

This seems about right -- the initial allegations of "involuntary manslaughter" and "aggravated assault" were absurd overcharges, and contradictory on their face: the first implies negligence, the latter depends on establishing the concept of mens rea, or roughly, "malign intent."

However poor Maj. Schmidt's judgment was, you can't accuse him of knowing that the Canadians were likely below, and of deliberately bombing them. The case would have hinged on his perception of events, and his right of self-defence ultimately would have trumped whatever the prosecutors might present.

I think the Air Force lawyers, too, realized the court-martial would have shattered on that point and wisely withdrew it.

I'm no more than a few miles from where the PPCLI regiment is based, so this whole thing was a terrible shock to people around here.

All day long I've been listening to armchair generals on the radio claiming great expertise and denouncing the dreadful "hotdog American cowboys" (not just the pilots involved, mind you -- the entire wretched American race).

Uh-huh.

If the instant experts had any idea what they were talking about, they just might shut up for a moment. Cain't we all jes' shut up? Cain't we?

"Friendly fire" has been the tragic concomitant of war since chemical-energy weapons found their way onto the battlefield and likely long before: I wonder how many Spartans at Thermopylae fell from a misaimed spear-thrust.

It isn't just Americans who shoot first and ask questions later. Canadian pilots in the Battle of Britain had a well-earned reputation for ballsy recklessness, and maybe that's exactly the type of attitude you want in fighter jocks.

The axiom that "There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots" doesn't exactly hold true in wartime: There may be few old, bold pilots, but there are surely fewer old, timid pilots.

The Royal Air Force delivered on time, too, if occasionally a few hundred yards short. The joke in the British Army was, "We didn't know which to fear more -- Jerry, or the RAF."

Knock on wood, I've never been in war. All I know of it is that it involves a lot of men, under a lot of stress, making a lot of split-second decisions with imperfect knowledge...

that once made, are irrevocable.

Let's play hypotheticals for a moment. Imagine that an F-16 pilot patrolling over Kandahar doesn't pull the trigger, and as a result four Canadians die.

His targetting radar lights up an enemy tank, but he elects not to fire on it, because he isn't really, really, really sure about what he's got in his sights. Maybe the conviction for manslaughter of some previous pilot whispers in his ear.

Seconds later that tank fires into the Canadian position, and four young men are killed and eight others wounded. Who's to blame then?

When Maj. Schmidt landed back at base and was informed by his CO that he had in fact bombed friendly troops, he fell to his knees and vomited.

That's punishment enough for me.


June 22, 2003

Boring Design Notes

As you can no doubt tell, I've been spending the weekend mucking around with HTML, with mixed results.

I like the blue date header, but it kind of screws up the top of the page.

Adding to my woes is that both Sitemeter and my Enetation comments are MIA, causing the blog to reenact the dear old days of dialup.

Crimsonblog is a pretty good free site -- immensely better than Blogspot [no link available], to name one -- but I still dream hopelessly of a Movable Type setup.

And someone to setup the setup.

And someone to setup the server costs, and the domain name. Also I wouldn't mind a Fender Stratocaster of any vintage if you could see your way to that...

I overreach, but,

A boy can dream, can't he?

June 23, 2003

Play That Funky Thing

Victoria Times-Colonist Apr. 25/2003

Sloppy and smelly male students who work for days on end without bathing are turning off would-be female students in the computer labs at the University of Victoria.

Even people who work in computer science at the university are not surprised that women are repelled. So the university is spending $30,000 to recruit and retain women in the field.

Uh, how? $30,000 worth of noseplugs and room freshener?

The 10:1 ratio of men to women in computer science is (drum roll) . . . all the men's fault!

If the women were as deeply interested in programming as the men are, they wouldn't notice. In fact they'd be pretty ripe themselves.

A letter writer to The Globe and Mail some years ago collected a lot of grief when he made the reasonable observation that women mainly used computers only as a tool for the task at hand.

Men were much more likely to tinker with them, whether that meant fiddling with the screen preferences or digging deeper into the system itself.

One outraged woman wrote in to say: "I've just finished installing a CD-ROM drive and a new sound card and I had to edit the AUTOEXEC.BAT file and..."

These are certainly praiseworthy accomplishments, though I doubt I'd be bragging about them to, say, a bunch of assembly-language purists.

I was most impressed with one guy I met in a Fidonet programming echo, who wrote a complete telecom package in GW-Basic, just to see if he could do it.

"It works okay, but it kinda sucks as far as speed goes," was his verdict.

This is why they invented the Internet. In cyberspace, no one knows if you're a dog or if you just smell like one.

June 24, 2003

Indiana Wants Me (Lord I Can't Go Back There)

A fascinating piece in Legal Affairs (courtesy of Instapundit) on the nature of "law" and "crime" in online games.

I don't play these myself (apart from periodic, suicidal forays into Counterstrike) and so I'd never even considered these issues.

June 25, 2003

Danny Boy

We had a tiny lad over tonight, all of two years old. And O he was an active boyo, drinking in the joy of life as he scampered hither and yon on his stubby little legs.

But he touched my heart unexpectedly when he tugged on my sleeve and looked up with those eyes so innocent and pretnaturally wise and said, "Yabba wagga oobie wagooo!"

Kids are such morons.

June 26, 2003

Down, Down, Down

I know that when Jay Leno comes on and I still haven't an idea what to babble about I'm in trouble.

I beg your indulgence. I'm working on a longer piece that I hope to post in the next couple of days and it's sort of sucking up whatever comedic oxygen I've got.

And it could be worse. Consider this effort, from some unnamed contributor to my blogroll, soon to be deleted therefrom:

it's close to 26 degrees & very pleasant. what's even more pleasant is that we may get a new toilet.

No. I will never sink this low. I will stick a plunger in it before the crap hits the waterline. I will bidet you adieu.

The day I start blogging about toilets is the day you should find more productive activities, and me too.

June 27, 2003

Blogrolls

Well, I must thank The Meatriarchy for adding me to (his? her? its?) blogroll and also these kind words:

I have added two excellent blogs to my skimpy blog list (apparently the secret to a successful blog is to have lots of links to other bloggers).

The Blog Quebecois - (which I presume is in Quebec -I'm smart like that) and I share something in common - we like racing simulation games. I'm counting the days till I get a house big enough to slap a giant screen TV somewhere and turn some virtual hot laps on Suzuka or Leguna Seca. He is also bang-on about Radiohead and record company copyright silliness.

Shux. One quick thing -- I'm not in Quebec, but rather, Alberta, where I've lived most of my life. The French side of me is Acadian. And I barely speak French, apart from what I remember from high school. It just seemed like a funny name. (And a play, for non-Canadians, on the Bloc Quebecois, the federal separatist party, if that isn't too much of an oxymoron.)

I'm sure The Meatriarchy knows this deep down, but I'll echo and amplify his (her? its?) remark on blogrolls and how they affect traffic for the benefit of new bloggers or those thinking about getting started.

I started this blog in earnest about mid-March. I registered it with every blog-listing service I could find, and I had about 11 hits over the next two months.

So out of boredom as much as anything else, I put in a blogroll (blogrolling.com, etc. are free and easy to install) and started tagging blogs that I liked to read. It's much easier than trying to find them in your bookmark file.

There are two types of bloggers: Those who obsessively track their counter logs, and those who lie about it.

Excuse me, I have to check something...

It's surprising who does come calling. In the last week I've had hits from Natalie Solent, Ken Layne and (I think) Tim Blair. I'm not gaming them, either -- I read them each just once or twice a day. But I do it from my blogroll, and when they see that same address popping up in their logs, they're sometimes curious (or bored) enough to click to whence it came.

No guarentee that they'll link to you -- but if one of them does...

About the second biggest thrill I've had lately was when Colby Cosh added me to his blogroll. The biggest was when he pointed out something I'd written, and my traffic went through the roof. (OK, from 3 hits a day to 30.)

More importantly, I got another couple of good sites linking to me because of it. Quality sites = psychic satisfaction + much quicker indexing in search engines.

So, class, what have we learned? 1) Link to people that you like reading. They just might link back. 2) Do not be metaphorically clipping your toenails or picking your nose when Rachel Lucas or Moxie rings the doorbell -- do you want to dance with the beautiful babes? Or do you, uh, not?

I'm running out of useful advice, and it is getting late.

John Hawkins has a useful FAQ on blogging here.

One final thing. Always be polite and grateful for the help you get from others.

So go visit The Meatriarchy now. Right now. Or I will shoot you.

June 28, 2003

Thoughts On Deck

I am staining my deck. It is an old and honorable tradition. It is something a man does. In A Movable Feast, Hemingway writes of the shocking lack of decks in Paris, and of how the French compensate by staining poodles. This is not something a man does.

A man stains decks. Women could stain decks too, I suppose, but that would royally screw up this opening, wouldn't it?

First the deck must be prepared. The elements are not kind to paint, at least not the cheap stuff I buy. It is merry work, and as strips of pigment and chips of wood fly, I am wont to raise my voice in song, prompting random donations of footwear, most of which bounce harmlessly short.

My discerning eye soon identifies a problem. One of the deck boards is badly rotted and in need of replacement. This will be done today, for I am a man of action. I have grown heartsick looking at it decay this last decade.

Not much is known about the carpenter who originally built the deck, but he was obviously powerful, angry, and well armed with 4½" phosphorus-coated spikes. After an hour-long attack with prybar, hacksaw and hammer, the board finally gives up the ghost, as does the hammer's shaft, as does the skin on my knuckles. As befits a sensitive, if profane, New Age guy, I have hewn the replacement board myself, with an axe of obsidian, whilst on a woodland retreat, naked and unashamed. (Actually I found it in the garage, and I had all my clothes on, and I was plenty ashamed beneath them, you bet. Details, details.)

"Measure twice, cut once," goes the adage, and it is good advice, for the board fits snugly at one end and comes up an inch short at the other. You'll never see this common problem addressed on those yuppie carpentry shows on PBS. Now, most would attempt to conceal this minor flaw by dragging the chaise longue over on top of it. This, though, would presume that one's chaise longue does not already conceal an even more grievous deformity. In that case, saw off an inconspicuous part of the chaise longue, wedge it into the gap, and jump up and down on it until it seamlessly melds with the surface of the deck. Okay, so it's not the Sistine Chapel. Okay, so it sticks out a bit. You'd have to be an idiot to trip over it.

This is the nature of work. Work is good. Through work we define ourselves. Work is zzzzZZZZ interrupted by a bee. Have you ever seen one close up? I'll tell you, they're . . . inhuman. I am not afraid of bees. With a small shriek of welcome, I retreat to the kitchen to get a beer, pausing only to trip over my little construction project. Actually, after a few beers, bees look sort of friendly. As long as there's a double glazed window between us, I'm cool with bees. They buzz; I get buzzed. This is what the biologists call symbiosis.

I -- hic! -- wuv bees. If you want to see truly terrifying insects, go to Africa. I lived there for two years, mainly in my bedroom, in a comforting fog of Black Flag. I tried to buy a flyswatter there. The Africans had absolutely no idea what a flyswatter was. They thought it immensely amusing that anyone would waste time wasting the pests. I eventually did get a flyswatter, though it had to come all the way from Canada. Once I had it, I embarked upon an orgy of flyswatting such as that continent has never seen. But then one night I was on the veranda (obsolete colonial word, meaning, "deck"), resting from my morbid labours, when a goliath beetle whirred through the air -- these things fly -- executed a 2½ Double Axel, and came spinning to a halt at my feet, insolently waving at me with all of its 613 legs. A goliath beetle, I should explain, looks something like a vise-grip equipped cockroach, though much less cute. It's also about the size of your fist. A flyswatter is a poor weapon with which to engage it. An elephant rifle would be more appropriate. Gentle reader, avert your eyes, for the battle that followed was fierce: Whamwhamwhamwham whamwhamwham -- beer break! -- whamwhamwhamwham! And so on. End of bug. End of flyswatter.

Equally unsettling was a species of wasp, jet-black in color, about three inches in length, with a wicked, curving abdomen reminiscent of a scorpion's. If they have wasps in Hell, these would be the prototype.

Another day, another hazardous journey outdoors, having milk and cookies with some U.S. Marines. Okay, so technically it wasn't milk and cookies. It was beer, and more beer. (Details, details.) What could have been a perfectly bibulous afternoon was spoiled somewhat when one of these dreadful insects chose to land on my face. Politely excusing myself, I removed my glasses and hurled them into the next time zone.

The Marines were greatly impressed, if you define "impressed" as shooting beer out their noses while rolling around on the ground.

"If you could throw a grenade that far, we'd sign you up," one finally spluttered. I dunno. Something tells me I wouldn't be very good at creeping silently through buggy jungles.

I once asked one of the Marines if anything scared him. He thought for a minute and said -- only one thing, being hit in the head by a bottle thrown from a passing car. Apparently this had once happened to a friend of his. And I thought: O, great. Now I've got another thing to be paranoid about. I don't get out much these days.

When landlords turn the drunken bee Out of the foxglove's door When butterflies renounce their drams I shall but drink the more!

-- Emily Deckinson


Well, what would she know about it? She never went out of her room.

One of the nice things about staining one's deck -- apart from the innate satisfactions of hard work, of pride in one's craft, and of enjoying the fresh air and sunshine -- is that this is perhaps the only sort of work that can be done quite effectively while legally drunk. Indeed, there is legislation before Parliament that would require deckstainers/dequstaineurs (in both official languages) to be stinking blotto, as opposed to simply stinking, which is the usual result of spending the afternoon crawling over a great big reflecting cedar magnifying glass being fried by UV rays.

But an emergency has arisen. The refrigerator contains no beer; it instead contains only an insipid liquid known as "light" beer. The Marines would have known what to do with "light" beer -- they would have called in an air strike on it. Well, cram this "nobility of work" masquerade, Jack. If I have to be sober, I've got better things to do.

Day 2

As perhaps the world's leading authority on deck-staining (you had someone else in mind?), I am often asked to calculate how much stain will be needed to cover the deck. My standard answer is: Bugger off. I didn't get to where I am today by giving out free advice.

But when repeatedly prodded, especially with pointy gardening implements, I will estimate that completely covering the average 10 x 15-foot deck will require about 440 1-gallon cans of stain. Of course, if you choose to take the stain out of the cans and put it on the deck with a brush or something, you might be able to get by with considerably fewer.

If you do decide to directly apply the stain, first set aside one of the cans. Open this can and make sure it is thoroughly stirred. Then pour the contents of this can over your head. The reasons for doing this are twofold:

1. It is necessary to propitate the God of the Deck, who lives underneath. His name is Larry.

2. You're going to look like this by the time you're done anyway, so best to get it over with all at once.

Now, lie down on the deck and roll around vigorously. First coat done! Time for a beer!

While in the house, be sure to touch as many things as possible. Walls, TV remote, children, floral arrangements. You need to do this because the police will find it easier to later retrace your movements. They'll need to do this because your wife is going to kill you.

Day 3

Because the finishing coat is of such critical importance, I recommend that you hire a couple of neighborhood kids who are ideally not afraid of bees.

And when it is completed, you can sit at the window and polish off a few well-deserved beers and use your megaphone to cry out to the neighbors: "See what I (or the neighborhood kids) hath Wrought!"

For what you look upon is more than a well-maintained and freshly stained deck, more than the altar of the smoking, hissing barbeque, more even than the symbol of stolid, bourgeous suburbia.

It is indeed the flat, rectangular, brown footprint of Civilization itself. Like a Colossus it rides astride the land and gazes unto the horizon. It represents Man's dominion over Nature, the triumph of Order over Chaos, the . . .

What? Go out and sit on it? Are you nuts?

Them's bees out thar!


Calling All The Ships At Sea

It's getting to be a bit overwhelming.

The very stylish Ghost Of A Flea linked to me (pardon the accidental rhyme) today as well as, uh, I didn't quite get the name, so I'll call him A Disgruntled American In Belgium. (Not that I can blame him. Heh. That sort of rhymes, too.)

I feel an odd sense of responsibility. There are literally dozens of people scattered around the world (Domo arigato, Japan!) waiting with bated breath on my latest effusion.

I just want to say: Mommmmy! Hellllllp meeeee!

Actually, it's probably the kick in the ass that I needed. The thought that people are actually reading what I write -- and this is somehow different than journalism or fiction writing, at which I've had (very) minor success -- is invigorating.

When I go to sleep knowing that the big old world is rolling over and that some Spaniard will soon turn on his computer and laugh and laugh -- well, it makes it all worthwhile.

Even if he isn't reading me. A laughing Spaniard is worthy in and of itself.

About June 2003

This page contains all entries posted to the blog quebecois in June 2003. They are listed from oldest to newest.

May 2003 is the previous archive.

July 2003 is the next archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33