National Post:
The CBC's Ombudsman has blasted businessman and commentator Kevin O'Leary for using the term ''Indian giver'' on his CBC News Network show, denouncing the term as "unambiguously offensive."
Not nearly as offensive as the term ''CBC Ombudsman,'' though maybe that's just me.
The executive producer for the show, The Lang & O'Leary Exchange, has apologized directly to Alex Jamieson, an aboriginal man who complained, but Mr. O'Leary is a contract commentator and cannot be forced to express regret, ombudsman Kirk LaPointe writes in the report, published last week.
Mr. O'Leary, known for his brash, provocative commentary, heads up global investment firm O'Leary Funds.
He cancelled an interview with the National Post Monday because, according to his assistant, he was ''advised'' not to speak publicly about the issue.
On Monday, the CBC was looking at making an on-air apology for the comment and has yet to speak with Mr. O'Leary about potentially doing the same, according to spokesperson Jeff Keay.
Mr. Jamieson filed the complaint in December, nearly two months after the episode in question aired on Oct. 4, 2010, the report said.
Co-host and CBC journalist Amanda Lang and Mr. O'Leary, who also stars on the popular CBC show Dragons' Den, were in a heated exchange about a report from the Conference Board of Canada on the financial implications for Saskatchewan if crown corporation PotashCorp. was taken over by Australian-based BHP Billiton.
Mr. O'Leary did not trust the report and said the private sector should be looking at the deal, instead of the government commissioning a report on a government deal.
Ms. Lang defended the conference board, saying it was credible and independent.
The province must see if a takeover would benefit its citizens, she said.
When she said there were likely a few people in the province who want PotashCorp. to remain a crown corporation, Mr. O'Leary responded angrily.
"You know, you are an Indian giver with a forked tongue. You sold these rights to somebody who paid hard cash for them. Now you don't like it anymore," he said.
Ms. Lang immediately criticized his choice of words. "Is there any other kind of backward example or statement phrase you want to use? Because that came from the 19th century and I do not approve."
She's on to something there. Most Indians want absolutely nothing to do with "giving" these days. "Taking," on the other hand . . .