« Sniggering Teenagers | Main | How To Fix Any Computer »

Maybe She Really, Really Hates Black People

CBC:

An advocacy group is criticizing an unusual decision by Edmonton police to release the name and photograph of a teenager accused of having unprotected sex without disclosing that she is HIV-positive.

"It makes you really sick to your stomach because you know that this is going to be following this young woman for the rest of her life," said Shelley Williams, the interim executive director of HIV Edmonton.

Well, what's the problem then? Surely this woman is going away for a long time, right? Right?

Johnson Aziga says he’s willing to take the blame — sort of — for killing two women and infecting at least five others through HIV transmission.

Aziga, 55, made the remarks during a rambling 45-minute statement in Ontario Superior Court on Tuesday, minutes after Mr. Justice Thomas Lofchik declared him a dangerous offender.

He is believed to be the first person in Canada convicted of murder through HIV transmission. The dangerous offender designation means he could be jailed indefinitely.

[. . .] Aziga, a divorced father of three and former research analyst with the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, was found guilty in April 2009 of two counts of first-degree murder, 10 counts of aggravated sexual assault and one count of attempted aggravated sexual assault. His convictions concern times he didn’t tell sexual partners he knew he carried the virus that causes AIDS before having intercourse. Five of the women became infected, with two dying of AIDS-related cancers.


But don'tcha worry, girl. The Edmonton Journal's head sob sister, Paula Simons, has got yo' back.


So should we all breathe a sigh of relief? After all, an accused serial sexual assailant is now in custody.

But this case isn’t quite so simple.

The accused in this case is a slim 17-year-old girl, a minor, a child of the streets, who, according to police, lives without a fixed address in Old Strathcona.

She isn’t accused of forcing anyone to have sex against his will.

Instead, three unnamed men, whose identities are protected by the rape shield law, have complained to police that this girl had consensual sex with them without first disclosing the fact that she was allegedly HIV positive.

Now this isn't the usual case of "woman = good/man = bad," although a casual reader of the Journal might certainly jump to that conclusion.

Nope. Simons is a Professional Journalist©​, and thus incapable of such crude stereotyping. So it must be something else that she has discovered about this man . . . something . . . some nuance that is beyond simple folks like us . ..

Comments (3)

john:

That's why "simple folks like us" are leaving the newspapers on the store shelf and switching the TV channel in greater numbers each year.

The one time it's nice to see unemployment numbers rise - is when you are referring to journalists.

Wow. So from this evidence, you deduce that I'm a racist? I'll tell you what the differences are between these two cases. Aziga was convicted, found guilty in a court of law. The girl in Edmonton has not been tried, much less convicted. We have no legal proof, as yet, that her accusers are telling the truth. Aziga is an adult, an educated professional who held a responsible government position. She's a mentally handicapped child, living on the streets, indigent, desperate, and too young to be charged as an adult. And, if it's relevant to your analysis, she's not white, but a member of a visible minority herself. Just so you know....

This isn't about race. It's about fair treatment for a disabled minor, who is innocent until proven guilty.

Anonymous:

"Wow. So from this evidence, you deduce that I'm a racist? ....."

Why not Pulla? You asshole urinanlists smear others with the epiphet "racism" all the time with less evidence than this. What's good for the goose baby....

Since you obviously read the blogs and since you "tough" "hardened" reporters are so thick skinned, let me ask YOU a couple of questions.

1) What qualifications are required to becme a journalist? Hmm? Ohter people with USEFUL jobs must obtain peer reviewed education and PROVE themselves qualified. Journalists? It's basically whatever drunken shit that stumbles in off the street> Right? No qualifications are REALLY needed at all. Isn't this true?

2) Why don't we ever hear stories about nepotism in the news community? I guess Paul Berton got his job because of his skill not because of his wealthy Toronto clique daddy - right?
What about sports caster Eric Francis? Did his rich mommy have anything to do with his career?

Yeah, we'll never see a story about THAT now will we hmm?

For that matter, pulla, how did you get YOUR JOB?

Fat chance of you answering these questions you thick skinned toughy you.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 15, 2011 7:03 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Sniggering Teenagers.

The next post in this blog is How To Fix Any Computer.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33
Site Meter