the blog quebecois

Hmmm. My apologies to anyone viewing this with a Netscape browser. I just noticed the problem a couple of days ago and had to do a bit of research to find out what was going on.

In fact, I usually use Netscape myself, but I post to this site with IE, because the WYSIWYG interface requires it. Because I'm a dunce with HTML. (Though I can throw acronyms around with abandon.)

A Netscape browser will show the pages with question marks dispersed randomly throughout.

This is because Crimsonblog was written on some MS software that apparently interprets some characters incorrectly. I didn't suspect this because my earlier blog on Crimsonzine worked fine with either browser.

A slightly more technical explanation:

It's people writing web pages with Windows software that uses the wrong character for apostrophes. Instead of the ' character, it uses a Windows specific character set that pretends to be iso-8859-X compatible but has characters in the "non printable control code" part of the ISO character sets. That's why you see them as question marks.

It's all a part of Gates' evil plan to destroy Netscape.

Although Netscape is doing a fine enough job of doing that all by itself. Its bookmarking function alone is enough to make you tear your hair out. And in any case, Netscape is pinin' for the fjords, according to Paul Kedrosky of the National Post.

AOL Time-Warner and Microsoft settled their lawsuit last week. The agreement amounts to a death sentence for Netscape, the former Internet browser kingpin. While that wasn't the avowed purpose of the deal, the result will be no different than if it was.

If this payment constitutes defeat, Microsoft would happily be defeated more often in future. After all, fear of Microsoft made AOL pay billions for a defunct Netscape, partly in hopes it could resuscitate the doomed company, but more to use the company as a legal stalking horse. But for its $8-billion investment, AOL received $750-million. That is a lousy rate of return in any economy.

Victoria Times-Colonist Apr. 25/2003

Even people who work in computer science at the university are not surprised that women are repelled. So the university is spending $30,000 to recruit and retain women in the field.

Uh, how? $30,000 worth of noseplugs and room freshener?

The 10:1 ratio of men to women in computer science is (drum roll) . . . all the men's fault!

If the women were as deeply interested in programming as the men are, they wouldn't notice. In fact they'd be pretty ripe themselves.

A letter writer to The Globe and Mail some years ago collected a lot of grief when he made the reasonable observation that women mainly used computers only as a tool for the task at hand.

Men were much more likely to tinker with them, whether that meant fiddling with the screen preferences or digging deeper into the system itself.

One outraged woman wrote in to say: "I've just finished installing a CD-ROM drive and a new sound card and I had to edit the AUTOEXEC.BAT file and..."

These are certainly praiseworthy accomplishments, though I doubt I'd be bragging about them to, say, a bunch of assembly-language purists.

I was most impressed with one guy I met in a Fidonet programming echo, who wrote a complete telecom package in GW-Basic, just to see if he could do it.

"It works okay, but it kinda sucks as far as speed goes," was his verdict.

This is why they invented the Internet. In cyberspace, no one knows if you're a dog or if you just smell like one.

If I had one wish it would be this:

World peace. No, scratch that.

I wish I could program computers at the level of Sid Meier (Civilization, etc.) or Will Wright (The Sims, etc.).

Then I could spend my evenings more productively than . . . er, whatever it is I spend them on now.

Lately I've been spending them on trying to migrate my Crimsonblog site to my homepage. I just now figured out how to get the archives to work but the formatting is still a mess.

This is a long way from barbarian armies gathering or angular women shim-shim-shimmying on the screen, but I do the best I can.

Weep not for gnotalex, for gnotalex will not weep for you.

I have no idea what that means, but the parallelism is irresistable.

And I must at all costs post, lest I be forgotten.

Via Hit and Run.

Are you a man or a woman?

male. Are you a man or a woman?

I am a female robot entity. Are you a man or a woman?

I am a male robot entity.

Thanks for telling me your gender, AFRObot. Male humans enjoy chatting with me.

I prefer to be a male.

I'm not sure if I would like to do it. What's it like?

Like one of the greatest pleasures you can imagine.

Interesting comparison.

I thought so too.

"Conversation" between two bots, ZolaOnAOL and AFRObot. The Turing Test postulates that if a human conversing with a remote computer could not distinguish it from another human, then a level of true artificial intelligence exists.

I suppose that the reverse of the Turing Test is already accomplished -- these bots have no idea whether they're talking to another bot or to a rather dense teenager.

baker baker baking a cake
make me a day
make me whole again
and I wonder what's in a day
what's in your cake this time

-- tori amos

Yes! Who needs a CD writer, when you could have this? For only $29.99, complete with:

* 1 replacement light bulb
* 1 additional tiny pan
* 6 Mixes for your PC Ez-Bake oven: Chocolate Cake, Vanilla Cake, Peanut Butter Cookie, Chocolate Chip Cookie, and Caffeinated Meatloaf (comes dehydrated)
* Special office friendly recipes including "Duck Sauce Packet Tart", "Vending Machine Casserole", and "Non-Dairy Creamer Creme Brulee"

Now the computer savvy among us can relive the fun of having your very own personal mini-oven with the PC Ez-Bake oven! It fits in a 5 1/4" drive bay and plugs right into your power supply with the included Molex connector. Also included is "PC Ez-Cook", the open-source oven controller software with hundreds of easy and creative recipes for your PC Ez-Bake oven, and even a fuzzy-logic cooking control system to precisely measure the doneness of your cake, cookie, or cheese souffle. The PC Ez-Bake oven can even be used to cook your Pop Tarts, Bagel Bites, or any tiny or flat food. YUM!

Well, I finally solved my browser problem. I was working on something and looked up to see that the monitor display had rotated counterclockwise 90 degrees. It was as if I'd picked up the monitor and put it down on its left side. Uh-oh, thinks me. This could be a sign that something might be wrong.

Now the recommended fix for this problem is to indeed flip the monitor on its side so that everything's right-side up and there you go.

But part of me hungered for a more elegant solution. My first thought was that the monitor was blown, but it has an onscreen menu and when I brought that up it was correctly positioned. Windows booted normally until it loaded the Welcome splash screen, when it again went sideways. So it's the video card or the driver.

The video card reported that it was in tip-top shape, thankyewverymuch (and if you think it's a lot of fun checking these things out while tilting your head at an angle it was never meant to go -- well, you would be wrong). I reinstalled the video drivers with no effect.

Then I remembered that XP has something called "recover points," by which you can restore a working copy of the system if something goes wrong. I was under the impression that it was done automatically, 'cause, like, that's what the documentation says. Since my software seemed pretty stable and the only hardware I had installed on the machine was a second hard drive, I never thought of manually creating one. Guess I should have.

About the only thing left to try was reinstalling Windows. I hate doing that, because it takes a long time and if it fails you're truly hooped. I did it often enough with Windows 98, though, so I found the install disk and put it in the drive to learn to my horror that XP (or at least this particular eMachines distro) doesn't allow for a non-destructive install -- it wipes the C drive first.

So I finally figured out how to force it to boot into Safe mode and spent the next few hours copying files to my D drive. Fortunately for my irreplacable collection of midget porn porn illegally downloaded music irreplacable files, I had enough room.

I took a deep breath and started the install, which took surprisingly little time. And what do you know, my video problems went away. As did my FTP program and some other things I forgot to copy.

Could have been worse, much worse. Looking on the bright side, my browser now works flawlessly, too.

Uh-oh.

Reuters:

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp. on Tuesday warned of eight "critical" security flaws in its Windows operating system and Office software that could allow attackers to take control of a computer.

Microsoft, whose Windows operating system runs on 90 percent of the world's computers, issued patches to fix the problems as part of its monthly security bulletin. It was the biggest such update since February 2005.

The world's biggest software maker defines a flaw as "critical" when the vulnerability could allow a damaging Internet worm to replicate without the user doing anything to the machine.

Six of the critical flaws related to Windows and two affected Office. Microsoft also issued another two security warnings it rated at its second-highest level of "important" for Windows as well as one it gave a severity rating of "moderate."

The quickest way to get the patches is to click Start --> All Programs --> Windows Update. Microsoft has recently upgraded its installer, so you might have to download that first.

Easier still is to set your computer up for automatic updates. Here's how:

1. Click Start, and then click Control Panel.

2. Depending on which Control Panel view you use, Classic or Category, do one of the following:

* Click System, and then click the Automatic Updates tab.

* Click Performance and Maintenance, click System, and then click the Automatic Updates tab.

3. Click the option that you want. Make sure Automatic Updates is not turned off.

Radar magazine attempts to play the interlocutor between Sgt. STAR, a US Army recruitment avatar, and Anna, an IKEA chat-bot:

Radar: What you got for guns, STAR?

Sgt. STAR: During basic training you will learn Basic Rifle Marksmanship and are required to qualify as marksman, sharpshooter, or expert on the M16A2 rifle to graduate.

Radar: Be honest, Anna. Would you rather have an M16A2 —- or some crappy drop-leaf table?

Anna: Please have a look at the tables.

Radar: I’m going to pretend you didn’t say that.

Anna: I have every confidence you will.

Mildly amusing, but I think it'd be funnier if Sgt. STAR and Anna "talked" to each other directly. The prejudices of the human (Bush = Bad; Gay = Good, etc.) gets in the way of machine-to-machine "communication," which can quickly achieve Zen-like weirdness. Maybe I'll give it a try or experiment with some different bots if I get the time.

Free, that is. 450+ freeware utilities and applications for Windows. All the links lead to the developers' websites, so there isn't much worry of spyware or viruses.

I can't vouch for all of them, but I've used quite a few, and they've all performed as advertised.

As a bonus, here's another 400 open-source programs.

Via Gadgetopia